Bitcoin Forum
January 19, 2019, 07:24:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ... 550 »
721  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How will Lightning Network be encouraged to use? on: January 17, 2018, 03:56:03 AM
there is no ETA. lightning developers have taken the position that there is "no rush" considering how much value is expected to be stored in payment channels. they are very concerned about ensuring that no funds are lost as a result of using the LN protocol.

having said that, it's pretty widely expected that LN will be usable by the general public sometime this year, likely in a matter of months. the next major step is to complete wallet implementations. we're already seeing lightning transactions on the network; now it's mainly just a matter of releasing the software.
It's not like there's an actual "official LN launch" date or anything like that. Rather LN will be "launched" when people feel confident enough in one or more implementations of LN to use it on the main Bitcoin network. In fact, you could consider LN to already be launched as there already are people using LN on the mainnet. Of course those people do so at the risk of their money, but nonetheless, the software mostly works and there are transactions occurring.

I wonder how a Lightning user interface would look like. Instead a "Send" button there will be "Open channel" button (same fee as just Send button + X bitcoins to deposit into channel) and then "Send via the opened channel" (no fee) and then "Close channel" (same fee as just Send button). Given this complexity and the fact that you have to spend twice as much in fees to send same amount of money as without LN I really wonder how the "greed" would work.
It's very likely that it will still just be a "Send" button. Channel management and all that will actually be handled by the software automatically. You put money into your LN wallet, and it will use that to open and close channels automatically. So when you want to send Bitcoin to someone, your LN wallet will have established several channels. It will also determine an optimal route and do everything automatically for you. There's no need for you to manually open and close channels yourself; the software will handle all of that for you.
722  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: help with achow101-payment-proto-interface on: January 17, 2018, 01:03:20 AM
Installed both vc_redist.x64&86 versions on windows 10 machine.  Same popup error when launching by double click and command line.  But when launching from command line, after closing the popup error message I get this in command line:

C:\Users\@@@@\Desktop>btcpp-cli-win64
Error loading Python DLL 'C:\Users\@@@@\AppData\local\Temp\_MEI14242\python36.dll'.
LoadLibrary:  The parameter is incorrect
Yeah... I'm not sure what's wrong there. This is my first time using pyinstaller to generate binaries.
723  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: BitcoinCore node crashing on: January 16, 2018, 11:14:36 PM
Now though when I run bitcoin-qt everything is as it should be for approx 40-50 min's until it crashes. I could probably even send the little bitcoin I have in that wallet out to somewhere else if the mining fee wasn't as high as it is. But then again I wonder what might happen if that transaction didn't confirm within the 40-50 min window before my node crashed again. But other than that it syncs up and then connects to approx 8 inbounds and 8 outbound peers at the beginning, shows my balance and runs properly for about 45mins then gives the fatal internal error. The wallet dat file is encrypted but is in the bitcoin folder and I have checked that my user has read and write access.
So the wallet is from your local computer and not the 21 raspi? If so, the raspi is completely irrelevant to this discussion.

I read back thru the debug file to the 7th of this month which I believe is when I tried to connect the 21 pi and found a line in there that said "possible stale tip detected" I'm not sure what that means
It means nothing. That error is benign.

but it occurs to me that I only put a days worth of the debug log file in the Pastebin would it be more helpful if I loaded more of the debug file?
Yes.
724  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Segwit question on: January 16, 2018, 11:10:38 PM
Very nice. Do you have a screenshot that shows how different wallets will be managed? I mean how the GUI will look like? im curious about that since im used to always using the same wallet with Core. How will the different wallet files be managed? I mean how the filenames will look like if they are all on the same folder? wallet001.dat, wallet.002.dat... or something?
There are no different wallets or wallet files. If you use Bitcoin Core 0.16+, your wallet will automatically begin using segwit unless you tell it not to by setting the addresstype option to legacy.
725  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / MOVED: Bitcoin based on not-Blockchain technology on: January 16, 2018, 11:08:52 PM
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.

Insubstantial and low effort
726  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: [POLL] How long to sync on an initial core install on: January 16, 2018, 06:57:28 AM
It will sync faster and have less disk I/O if you increase the dbcache. This requires more RAM though. Raising the dbcache to anything larger than 8000 MB (-dbcache=8000 is large enough to store the whole thing in memory and then flush right at the end so there's significantly less disk I/O then. Of course you will need plenty of RAM in order to set the dbcache to that high.
727  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: help with achow101-payment-proto-interface on: January 16, 2018, 06:53:01 AM
I can work with I have, but would rather have it working on my windows 10 machine since that is where my Armory wallet is running.
I then went over to my windows 10 machine and tried btcpp-cli-win64 and this is the error I got:

btcpp-cli-win64.exe - Bad Image

C:\Users\@@@@@@\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI77402\VCRUNTIME140.dll
is either not designed to run on Windows or it cointains an error.  Try
installing the program again using the original installation media or contact your system administrator or the software vendor or support.
Error Status 0xc000000d
Try installing the Visual C++ Redistributable available here: http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=52685. That should hopefully add the VCRUNTIME140.dll it wants to your system.
728  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Why do not all exchanges offer transaction batching? on: January 16, 2018, 03:47:42 AM
  Some people are asking for Gemini do this. And I see that is not so common. I know that batching transaction will be slower. But there are other problems for exchanges do this? Is there any risk?
It's mostly just slightly harder to implement. There's also a privacy risk because the receivers in that batch can see how much money everyone else in the batch is withdrawing, but they don't really know who those people are, so that's not much of an issue.
729  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: help with achow101-payment-proto-interface on: January 16, 2018, 03:42:55 AM
Error: could not find paymentrequest_pb2.py. Create it with 'protoc --proto_path
=./ --python_out=./ paymentrequest.proto'
Oops, I screwed up the build. I uploaded new builds (replacing the old ones), try those.
730  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Segwit question on: January 16, 2018, 02:06:23 AM
The thing is, I don't feel confident using segwit until at least May when Core will release 0.16
Bitcoin Core 0.16.0 will be released sooner than May. It will probably be released in February as we are already in the feature freeze stage since the segwit wallet PR has already been merged.
731  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Quantum computing and the Security of your Crypto?! on: January 16, 2018, 02:04:07 AM
Please use Google and read one of the other billion threads about quantum computing and Bitcoin.
732  Bitcoin / Alternative clients / Re: Created TREZOR address with Ledger nano S ...problem on: January 16, 2018, 01:59:58 AM
Oh ok, but how do I tell my wallet software? Smiley
What wallet software are you using?  Wink
733  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: help with achow101-payment-proto-interface on: January 16, 2018, 01:58:28 AM
I downloaded btcpp-cli-win64 this time.  Norton didn't like and removed, so restored and gave it trust in file insight.  Double clicked it and launched fine.  Created invoice for bitpay, and on invoice clicked copy to reveal the uri.  Copied uri from invoice, but wouldn't let me paste into the tool---so typed it.  When i hit enter the tool closed.  

That is the furthest i've gotten on any of my attempts.  I didn't get error msg, or crash report, but if you tell me where to look, i'll find it then post.
Open up a command prompt or powershell in the folder containing btcpp-cli-win64 (with nothing in the folder selected, hold shift then right click, choose "Open command prompt" or "Open powershell"). Type btcpp-cli-win64 to run the program from there. Follow the instructions, and if it fails, post the output. There should be a python traceback if it fails.
734  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: BitPay no longer compatible with Armory on: January 15, 2018, 11:12:04 PM
I'm on my windows 7, I downloaded btcpp-qt-win64, I went to norton file insight and trusted it and double clicked to launch.  rather than opening, it hung and i got the windows message to close program or look online for solution.  I didn't get the error message like i had been, but here are the details from crash report:

Problem signature:
  Problem Event Name:   APPCRASH
  Application Name:   btcpp-qt-win64.exe
  Application Version:   0.0.0.0
  Application Timestamp:   5a2e9fe6
  Fault Module Name:   Qt5Core.dll
  Fault Module Version:   5.9.3.0
  Fault Module Timestamp:   5a0c7e9d
  Exception Code:   c0000005
  Exception Offset:   00031c31
  OS Version:   6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
  Locale ID:   1033
  Additional Information 1:   0a9e
  Additional Information 2:   0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
  Additional Information 3:   0a9e
  Additional Information 4:   0a9e372d3b4ad19135b953a78882e789
Strange.

Are you able to use the command line version?
735  Bitcoin / Alternative clients / Re: Created TREZOR address with Ledger nano S ...problem on: January 15, 2018, 11:11:08 PM


Here. I mistakenly selected TREZOR and at the botom wre displayed trezor addresses and I put all my tokens in TREZOR adress, instead I should click the LEDGER and deposit in Ledger addresses. And now cant withdraw them...do you know how?
Those are not TREZOR addresses but rather addresses using a derivation path that is default for the TREZOR. Since it is just a derivation path, your ledger can sign for those keys. You just need to tell your wallet software that you are using a Ledger and that the derivation path is m/44'/61'/0'/0 instead of the Ledger default.
736  Bitcoin / Alternative clients / Re: Created TREZOR address with Ledger nano S ...problem on: January 15, 2018, 06:11:30 PM
What do you mean by "created trezor address with ledger nano s"? Do you mean you imported your trezor seed onto the ledger? Or do you mean something else? How did you do this?
737  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: lost funds for multisig on regtest on: January 15, 2018, 06:07:36 PM
createmultisig does not add the address to your wallet. So the multisig address is not part of your wallet and thus not listed in listunspent.

To add it to your wallet, you need to use addmultisigaddress.
738  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Looking for decent guides on how to open Segwit compliant wallets. on: January 15, 2018, 06:03:18 PM
What do you mean by "making electrum/core segwit compliant"? Do you mean how to make a segwit wallet with these software?
739  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: BitcoinCore node crashing on: January 15, 2018, 06:00:31 PM
I'm only guessing, but so far the only thing I can think of is when I tried to hook up the 21 ras pi that is where the driver power state failure happened and the blue screen from that event is what might have? caused the corruption of the files or just the wallet data?
If you pulled the power from the raspi and then took the wallet file off of it afterwards, that could have caused it to become corrupted as the database is still open and there are other files that you need when the wallet database is still open.

Have you tried just powering on the raspi again and seeing if you can access the wallet there?
740  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: BitPay no longer compatible with Armory on: January 15, 2018, 05:53:19 PM
double clicked to launch, starts to open then closes with message saying missing .dll file.
What .dll file does it say is missing?
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 [37] 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ... 550 »
Bitcointalk.org is not available or authorized for sale. Do not believe any fake listings.
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!